In April 2026, a researcher reported that frontier reasoning models had scored a perfect 180 on an officially disclosed LSAT. Three years earlier, OpenAI said GPT-4 scored 163, around the 88th percentile.
So a chatbot can now explain almost any Logical Reasoning question you throw at it, at any hour, for the price of a subscription. That changes what’s worth paying a person for.
For a professional squeezing prep around a full-time job, private time is expensive time. It earns its price when someone works out why you keep missing the same kind of question, faster than you could alone. Whether you book LSAT tutoring from an independent veteran or a company package, that diagnosis is the thing to buy.
Below are five one-on-one options, compared on experience, format, and full cost.
How we built this list: Desk research only. We reviewed official tutoring pages, published terms, LSAC announcements, and Trustpilot profiles, checked on October, 2026. We didn’t buy sessions, interview tutors, or track student outcomes. Ranking reflects fit for working professionals, not measured score gains. Prices and results are as published by each provider.
What AI Handles, and What You’re Still Paying a Human For
A chatbot is a decent explainer. Paste in a question you got wrong and ask why the right answer works, and you’ll usually get a clear walk-through.
It’s a weaker diagnostician. It sees one question at a time, not the pattern across your last six practice tests. And chatbots tend to drift toward agreeing with a user who pushes back. OpenAI rolled back a GPT-4o update in 2025 for exactly that, and it’s still training models to stop agreeing with users reflexively.
Picture an illustrative case: you insist answer B is defensible, and the bot starts finding reasons you might be right. That’s the opposite of what a reasoning test needs.
The practical split for a busy schedule is simple. Use AI between sessions to drill and to ask why. Save paid hours for diagnosis, timing, and strategy. Using AI study tools works best when you ask for reasoning rather than answers, as AI study tools for students generally do. Check LawHub’s terms before pasting licensed official questions into any outside tool.
The 5 Options at a Glance
| Provider | Format | Published starting price | Extra costs to check | Best fit |
| Bob Verini | Independent, mainly Zoom; Boston in person | $250/hour online | LawHub Advantage | Direct work with one veteran |
| 7Sage | Dedicated 172+ tutor, online | $2,399 for 10 hours | LawHub plus 7Sage site access | Data-driven study plans |
| Kaplan | Tutoring bundled with live online course | $1,999 per package (regular) | LawHub | Course plus personal help |
| PowerScore | Hourly or packages; online or in person | $175/hour, 2-hour minimum | Materials on hourly plans | A short, targeted fix |
| Blueprint | Matched tutor plus course access | $2,699 per package | $124 LawHub Advantage | Help choosing a tutor |
LawHub Advantage, LSAC’s subscription for official practice tests, costs $124 a year. Almost every course or tutor on this list needs you to have it.
1. Bob Verini

Bob Verini works independently, and you get him rather than a rotating roster. He says he has taught the LSAT for more than 45 years, starting under Stanley Kaplan and later directing Kaplan’s LSAT curriculum for two decades. He has also written LSAT books and trained LSAT teachers.
He reports teaching more than 10,000 students, including some who gained 30 points or more and several who reached 180. He says he has scored a perfect 180 himself, more than once.
His stated method is the diagnostic one: find where you’re losing points, focus each session there, and give real-time feedback so the same mistake stops recurring. Sessions run mostly over Zoom, with in-person tutoring around Boston.
Pricing:
- $250 an hour online, and $300 an hour in person around Boston, with a group rate for two or three students.
- Personal statement help is also $250 an hour. Email and text support between sessions is free, and he requires no books beyond a LawHub subscription.
- A free 15- to 20 minute meet-and-greet comes first. Sessions usually run one to two hours, often weekly, and can be moved with five hours’ notice. No-shows are charged in full.
Best for: professionals who want one experienced teacher steering limited study hours toward specific weak spots. The trade-off is that you’re relying on one person’s availability, with no matching team behind him.
2. 7Sage

7Sage pairs you with a dedicated tutor who scored 172 or higher. That tutor builds the plan around your practice analytics. Each package includes a free half-hour introductory assessment.
That suits someone who has already logged timed sections and wants an expert to read the data. 7Sage says its tutoring students gain about one point per session on average. Treat that as a company-reported figure, not a typical result.
Pricing:
- Tutoring packages are $2,399 for 10 hours, $4,399 for 20 hours and $5,999 for 30 hours.
- Separate self-study subscriptions run $69 to $299 a month, and LawHub Advantage is extra. Confirm which 7Sage plan your tutoring requires before treating the package price as your total.
On Trustpilot, 7Sage LSAT holds a 5-out-of-5 TrustScore from about 875 reviews. That profile covers all its LSAT products, not tutoring alone.
3. Kaplan

Kaplan bundles private tutoring with its live online LSAT course. The course supplies a schedule and syllabus, and tutoring handles your individual gaps. Packages come in 10, 20, 30 and 40 hours.
Pricing:
- Standard starts at a regular $1,999. Premium starts at $3,999 and adds tutors with 99th-percentile scores and more than five years’ experience, plus a personal statement review.
- Keep the Premium credentials attached to Premium when you compare tiers.
- LawHub is required, so check the cart total.
The bundle makes sense if you’re starting from scratch. If you already have a plan and just need help with Reading Comprehension timing, ask yourself whether you’ll actually use the course you’re paying for.
Kaplan Test Prep holds a 4.5 TrustScore from roughly 6,300 reviews. That count covers its whole test-prep business, nursing exams included.
4. PowerScore

PowerScore has the lowest-commitment entry on this list. It charges $175 an hour with a two-hour minimum, and all its tutors scored 170 or higher. Sessions run online through Adobe Connect or in person, depending on location.
That makes it a sensible test for one defined problem. Use AI drills first to pin down the gap, then book two hours to fix it.
Pricing:
- Packages cost $800 for five hours, $1,500 for 10, and $2,800 for 20.
- Packages include an online practice platform and performance analytics. Hourly sessions don’t include these, so ask what to bring.
- PowerScore says its tutors work from its own methods and from publicly released official LSATs. Students arriving with another company’s materials should ask how that will work.
We didn’t find a usable third-party rating specific to PowerScore’s LSAT tutoring, so none is listed here.
5. Blueprint

Blueprint matches you with a tutor and will re-match you free if the fit isn’t right. That helps if you’d rather talk your needs through with a team than choose a tutor yourself.
Pricing:
- Core tutoring starts at $2,699 and includes six months of the self-paced course.
- Premium starts at $4,199, adds Live Online access and specifies tutors scoring in the 99th percentile.
- 170+ Tutoring starts at $4,799.
- All three exclude the $124 LawHub Advantage fee, unless you qualify for an exemption or already have it.
Read the guarantees carefully. For Core and Premium, Blueprint’s score-increase guarantee gives eligible students five free tutoring hours if their score doesn’t rise. The 170+ guarantee has its own conditions. Neither is an admissions promise.
Blueprint’s LSAT profile on Trustpilot shows a 1.8 TrustScore from 314 reviews. That number looks worse than the reviews themselves: 85% of them are five-star. But only three arrived in the past 12 months, and Trustpilot weights recent reviews more heavily. Either way, the profile covers Blueprint’s broader LSAT products, so it says little about current tutoring.
Before You Book
The test itself shifted in August 2026. LSAC moved nearly all test-takers to in-person sitting at Prometric centers, with limited exceptions for distance and certain medical or disability accommodations. It also introduced a new LawHub delivery interface. LSAC says content and format didn’t change, and it updated its official PrepTests to match the new screens. Ask any tutor how they’ll get you practising in that interface.
Then ask every provider the same few questions:
- Who exactly will teach me, and what happens if the match doesn’t work?
- What should I do between sessions, and can AI tools handle any of it?
- Which materials, subscriptions or LawHub fees sit outside the quoted price?
- How can the plan change if my weak areas shift?
Get the agreed scope and the full cost in writing.
FAQs
Q.1 How much does private LSAT tutoring cost?
Published rates here start at PowerScore’s $175 an hour, with a two-hour minimum. Bob Verini charges $250 an hour online. Package-based options start around $2,000 to $2,700 before the $124 LawHub fee.
Q.2 Can a chatbot replace a tutor?
For explanations, often yes. For spotting your recurring errors across many tests, and for pushing back when you’re wrong, a skilled human still has the edge.
Q.3 Can I prep online if I test in person?
Yes. Online tutoring has nothing to do with where you sit the exam. From August 2026, most test-takers sit the LSAT in person regardless of how they prepared.
Q.4 Does tutoring guarantee a higher score?
No. Provider-reported gains aren’t typical results, and commercial guarantees carry conditions. A score guarantee is never an admissions guarantee.
The machines already know the answers. The question for your next free consultation is whether this tutor can explain why you keep picking the wrong ones.
Related: AI Knows What Students Get Wrong. It Doesn’t Always Know Why
| Disclaimer: This article was submitted by a guest contributor. The views, opinions, and information presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of AIInsightsNews. The content is provided for informational and educational purposes only. |
